We founded Cohere on a simple conviction: that the value of artificial intelligence is
measured by what it does for people, and that the surest way to serve people is to put capable, trustworthy
intelligence directly into the hands of the institutions they depend on.
Human wellbeing is not one thing. It is health, and knowledge, and the dignity of being addressed in your
own language. It is meaningful work, functioning public services, safety from harm, control over your own
information, and a habitable planet to enjoy all of it on. A company that says its highest purpose is
wellbeing owes an account across every one of those dimensions — which is how this report is organised.
The account is a good one. Our models are accelerating literature review and scientific analysis in
biopharma, where the time between a question and an answer is measured in lives. They are supporting
teaching, research and student services across one of the world's great universities, and building the
talent pipeline behind it. Through Aya, they speak 101 languages — built with more than three thousand
researchers in 119 countries — and through Tiny Aya they now do it on a phone, without a data centre in
sight. They serve governments in Canada, the United Kingdom and beyond, so that public institutions can
modernise without surrendering control of citizens' data to anyone.
That last point is the thread through all of it. We build intelligence that institutions can own, run and
govern themselves — on their own premises, inside their own security perimeter, under their own law. North
and Compass are not sold in any configuration where we hold a customer's data. That is a structural choice,
not a marketing one, and it is why a hospital, a ministry or a bank can adopt frontier AI at all.
Building capably also means building efficiently. Command A serves at frontier quality on two GPUs where
comparable systems needed thirty-two. Command A+ runs on a single accelerator. Tiny Aya runs in a pocket.
Every one of those is a reduction in the energy, hardware and cost required to deliver the same benefit —
and the reason our research team has argued publicly for standardised ways to measure and compare model
efficiency across the whole industry.
This is our first impact report, and we publish it in that spirit: proud of the work, precise about the
evidence, and clear about where we are deepening the measurement next. The final chapter sets out exactly
how, over the coming twelve months.
Illustrative leadership message · Prepared for a first reporting cycle